ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. 社会科学研究所
  3. 社会科学ジャーナル
  4. 76号 (2013.9)

From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan

https://doi.org/10.34577/00000055
https://doi.org/10.34577/00000055
2ed56c44-a404-4643-ad37-f6fe62af8cc1
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
No76GiorgioShani.pdf From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan (629.0 kB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2013-11-01
タイトル
タイトル From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan
言語 en
タイトル
タイトル From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/00000055
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 Shani, Giorgio

× Shani, Giorgio

WEKO 65

en Shani, Giorgio

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This article will attempt to provide a genealogy of security by examining the
transition from national to human security with reference to contemporary Japan
after the tragic events of March 11, 2011. It will be argued that the national
security doctrine, based on the assumptions that the state is the main referent
of security and is responsible for the protection of its citizens, continues to be
hegemonic in both the theory and practice of international relations. This will
be discussed with reference to Hobbes’s classic defence of sovereignty in the
Leviathan (1651). However, in recent years, it has been seen as unable to deal
with the plethora of challenges associated with globalization; global climate
change, international economic crises, transnational terrorism and crime, nuclear
proliferation, all challenge the capabilities of states individually and collectively
to provide security for their citizens. Consequently, attempts have been made
to “broaden and deepen” security by re-conceptualizing security as “human
security”. Both “narrow” and “broad” approaches to human security will be then
introduced before it will be argued that human security may be seen as a form
of “biopolitics” (Foucault, 2003, 2007, 2008). An attempt will then be made to
illustrate the argument with reference to Japan. Whereas the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and Japan International Cooperation Agency have both incorporated
“human security” into Japan’s Foreign Policy to differing degrees, the Japanese
state remains wedded to the national security doctrine and has been reluctant
to make human security a domestic priority after 3.11. In conclusion, it will be
argued that an explicit commitment to protecting and empowering all residents
of Japan will better serve Japan’s ‘national interest’ rather than a narrow focus
on defending territorial claims against her neighbours and regional trading
partners.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 社会科学ジャーナル

号 76, p. 5-24, 発行日 2013-09-01
出版者
出版者 国際基督教大学
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 04542134
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:42:06.192036
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3