WEKO3
アイテム
From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan
https://doi.org/10.34577/00000055
https://doi.org/10.34577/000000552ed56c44-a404-4643-ad37-f6fe62af8cc1
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan (629.0 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-11-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | From National to Human Security? Reflections on Post 3.11 Japan | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00000055 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
Shani, Giorgio
× Shani, Giorgio |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This article will attempt to provide a genealogy of security by examining the transition from national to human security with reference to contemporary Japan after the tragic events of March 11, 2011. It will be argued that the national security doctrine, based on the assumptions that the state is the main referent of security and is responsible for the protection of its citizens, continues to be hegemonic in both the theory and practice of international relations. This will be discussed with reference to Hobbes’s classic defence of sovereignty in the Leviathan (1651). However, in recent years, it has been seen as unable to deal with the plethora of challenges associated with globalization; global climate change, international economic crises, transnational terrorism and crime, nuclear proliferation, all challenge the capabilities of states individually and collectively to provide security for their citizens. Consequently, attempts have been made to “broaden and deepen” security by re-conceptualizing security as “human security”. Both “narrow” and “broad” approaches to human security will be then introduced before it will be argued that human security may be seen as a form of “biopolitics” (Foucault, 2003, 2007, 2008). An attempt will then be made to illustrate the argument with reference to Japan. Whereas the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Japan International Cooperation Agency have both incorporated “human security” into Japan’s Foreign Policy to differing degrees, the Japanese state remains wedded to the national security doctrine and has been reluctant to make human security a domestic priority after 3.11. In conclusion, it will be argued that an explicit commitment to protecting and empowering all residents of Japan will better serve Japan’s ‘national interest’ rather than a narrow focus on defending territorial claims against her neighbours and regional trading partners. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 社会科学ジャーナル 号 76, p. 5-24, 発行日 2013-09-01 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 04542134 | |||||
