WEKO3
アイテム
Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction
https://doi.org/10.34577/00005016
https://doi.org/10.34577/0000501614c59a4c-4a76-41b4-919e-84bc6f1b64e2
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction (122.0 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2022-02-14 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00005016 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
Smith, Guy
× Smith, Guy |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Traditionally in critical thinking and argumentation instructional approaches groups of general argument patterns have often been listed and taught as fallacies, for example ad-hominem, slippery slope, and black and white. The definition of a fallacy is that it represents a general argument that applies invalid or faulty reasoning. However, the implication of listing groups of argument patterns as fallacies is that the problem with the argument is seen to be in the inherent form of the argument. Previous work, however, has pointed out that it is not the form but the content, the weakness or strength of the claim itself and the perspective being brought to the claim that determines the reasonableness or appropriateness of the claim, or whether it may display invalid or faulty reasoning. Building upon this body of work and my own experience, I develop a position arguing against using a traditional approach of instruction that describes groups of argumentative patterns as fallacies due to their inherent form. I also argue that the traditional approach has some potentially serious drawbacks for student attitudes and critical thinking dispositions. Finally, an alternative approach for how these argument patterns could be used as teaching materials that reflect a more real-world oriented paradigm is discussed. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 語学研究 巻 36, p. 62-69, 発行日 2021-01-06 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09133615 | |||||
