{"created":"2023-05-15T09:33:11.081865+00:00","id":5236,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"f39c0a19-6933-43c8-8989-60e66b22dbc9"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"5236","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5236"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005236","sets":["12:317:552"]},"author_link":["7961"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-01-06","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"69","bibliographicPageStart":"62","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"36","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"語学研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Traditionally in critical thinking and argumentation instructional approaches\ngroups of general argument patterns have often been listed and taught as\nfallacies, for example ad-hominem, slippery slope, and black and white. The\ndefinition of a fallacy is that it represents a general argument that applies invalid\nor faulty reasoning. However, the implication of listing groups of argument\npatterns as fallacies is that the problem with the argument is seen to be in the\ninherent form of the argument. Previous work, however, has pointed out that it\nis not the form but the content, the weakness or strength of the claim itself and\nthe perspective being brought to the claim that determines the reasonableness or\nappropriateness of the claim, or whether it may display invalid or faulty\nreasoning. Building upon this body of work and my own experience, I develop a\nposition arguing against using a traditional approach of instruction that\ndescribes groups of argumentative patterns as fallacies due to their inherent\nform. I also argue that the traditional approach has some potentially serious\ndrawbacks for student attitudes and critical thinking dispositions. Finally, an\nalternative approach for how these argument patterns could be used as teaching\nmaterials that reflect a more real-world oriented paradigm is discussed.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00005016","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国際基督教大学","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"09133615","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Smith, Guy","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7961","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2022-02-14"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"7_Smith.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"122.0 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5236/files/7_Smith.pdf"},"version_id":"744eab5f-3bff-40fe-8489-73078319774c"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction","subitem_title_language":"en"},{"subitem_title":"Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["552"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2022-02-14"},"publish_date":"2022-02-14","publish_status":"0","recid":"5236","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["Rethinking the Concept of Fallacies in Argumentation Instruction"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-09-30T06:42:19.924376+00:00"}