WEKO3
アイテム
リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004473
https://doi.org/10.34577/000044737cc83ed0-704f-4d3a-a488-5125ddbc53f4
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味 (1.2 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-04-05 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Meanings of Locality in Risk Society Theory | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00004473 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
萩原, 優騎
× 萩原, 優騎 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Ulrich Beck is a sociologist famous for his risk society theory. He kept revising his theory focusing on the relationship between the global and local dimensions of risks in the contemporary society. At first he exaggerated the risks caused by the contemporary science and technology is global, but he gradually became interested in the variety of the processes and the results of modernization. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how he revised his theory and clarified the meanings of locality in risk society theory. When Beck proposed risk society theory in the 1980s, he mainly focused on the characters of global risks. The origin of global risks is modern European society which started as an industrial society. As a result of radicalization of modernity under the influence of science and technology, the situation which is called risk society appeared. This process is named reflexive modernization. All the people in the world cannot escape from the global risks now. In the 1990s Beck started to revise his theory by referring to Roland Robertson. According to Robertson, globalization is not a phenomenon extending in one direction. When the waves of globalization rush, the process of localization starts because traditions as a basis of a stable daily life in the concerned area are not self-evident anymore. Variety of locality will not disappear through the process of globalization. Globalization and localization are the two sides of the same coin. After the 2000s, Beck often explained the importance of cosmopolitan cooperation all over the world to address global common issues. He distinguished cosmopolitanization as a sociological phenomenon from cosmopolitanism as a philosophical idea. Cosmopolitanization means that reflexive modernization is inescapable though its processes and results are various. The key of cosmopolitan cooperation is the function of cities which connect the global and local dimensions of decision-making. However, it is not clear how and in what conditions people can actualize cosmopolitan cooperation. Many people feel anxiety in risk society because they lack safety and security. Beck says that this situation will be a driving force of cosmopolitan cooperation, but which can be optimism. For example, anxiety does not necessarily integrate people and society in Japan. It is important to analyze the characters of locality instead of general principles to achieve cosmopolitan cooperation. Moreover, Beck’s statements may bring about unexpected results. He says that everyone on the earth is under the influence of global risks such as radioactive contamination. Such an opinion can be abused to obscure the responsibility of the perpetrators as a result the difference between the victims and the perpetrators becomes ambiguous. In spite of such a problem, the view of risk society theory is useful to reconsider the characters and the tasks of locality in relation to global risks. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 社会科学ジャーナル 号 86, p. 5-24, 発行日 2019-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 04542134 | |||||
