{"created":"2023-05-15T09:32:44.903258+00:00","id":4632,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3af76de9-9657-461b-aa66-eae1946b72f5"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"4632","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4632"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004632","sets":["12:26:19:482"]},"author_link":["6919"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2019-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"86","bibliographicPageEnd":"24","bibliographicPageStart":"5","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"社会科学ジャーナル","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　Ulrich Beck is a sociologist famous for his risk society theory. He kept\nrevising his theory focusing on the relationship between the global and local\ndimensions of risks in the contemporary society. At first he exaggerated the\nrisks caused by the contemporary science and technology is global, but he\ngradually became interested in the variety of the processes and the results\nof modernization. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how he revised his\ntheory and clarified the meanings of locality in risk society theory.\n　When Beck proposed risk society theory in the 1980s, he mainly focused\non the characters of global risks. The origin of global risks is modern European\nsociety which started as an industrial society. As a result of radicalization\nof modernity under the influence of science and technology, the situation\nwhich is called risk society appeared. This process is named reflexive modernization.\nAll the people in the world cannot escape from the global risks now.\n　In the 1990s Beck started to revise his theory by referring to Roland Robertson.\nAccording to Robertson, globalization is not a phenomenon extending\nin one direction. When the waves of globalization rush, the process of\nlocalization starts because traditions as a basis of a stable daily life in the\nconcerned area are not self-evident anymore. Variety of locality will not disappear\nthrough the process of globalization. Globalization and localization are\nthe two sides of the same coin.\n　After the 2000s, Beck often explained the importance of cosmopolitan\ncooperation all over the world to address global common issues. He distinguished cosmopolitanization as a sociological phenomenon from cosmopolitanism\nas a philosophical idea. Cosmopolitanization means that reflexive\nmodernization is inescapable though its processes and results are various. The\nkey of cosmopolitan cooperation is the function of cities which connect the\nglobal and local dimensions of decision-making.\n　However, it is not clear how and in what conditions people can actualize\ncosmopolitan cooperation. Many people feel anxiety in risk society because\nthey lack safety and security. Beck says that this situation will be a driving\nforce of cosmopolitan cooperation, but which can be optimism. For example,\nanxiety does not necessarily integrate people and society in Japan. It is important\nto analyze the characters of locality instead of general principles to\nachieve cosmopolitan cooperation.\n　Moreover, Beck’s statements may bring about unexpected results. He says\nthat everyone on the earth is under the influence of global risks such as radioactive\ncontamination. Such an opinion can be abused to obscure the responsibility\nof the perpetrators as a result the difference between the victims and the\nperpetrators becomes ambiguous. In spite of such a problem, the view of risk\nsociety theory is useful to reconsider the characters and the tasks of locality\nin relation to global risks.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00004473","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"04542134","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"萩原, 優騎","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"6919","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-04-05"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"86号1-萩原優騎.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4632/files/86号1-萩原優騎.pdf"},"version_id":"0dfbace1-6240-4d3e-9efa-f34eb192a796"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Meanings of Locality in Risk Society Theory","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["482"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2019-04-05"},"publish_date":"2019-04-05","publish_status":"0","recid":"4632","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["リスク社会論におけるローカリティの意味"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-02T02:25:57.493807+00:00"}