ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. 社会科学研究所
  3. 社会科学ジャーナル
  4. 91号 (2024.3)

フィルターバブル論の精神分析的観点からの 解釈の可能性  —パーソナライゼーションの問題を中心として—

https://doi.org/10.34577/0002000196
https://doi.org/10.34577/0002000196
163839f5-5381-4dd9-8811-a5456f1d6e48
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
JSS91号3萩原.pdf フィルターバブル論の精神分析的観点からの 解釈の可能性  —パーソナライゼーションの問題を中心として— (519 KB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2024-05-13
タイトル
タイトル フィルターバブル論の精神分析的観点からの 解釈の可能性  —パーソナライゼーションの問題を中心として—
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル A Possibility of an Interpretation of the Filter Bubble Theory from the Viewpoint of Psychoanalysis: Focusing on Personalization Problems
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/0002000196
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 萩原, 優騎

× 萩原, 優騎

WEKO 2584

ja 萩原, 優騎

en HAGIWARA, Yuki

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The public in contemporary society is networked. People live in an environment where ICT (Information and Communication Technology) has developed and spread. Eli Pariser proposed the filter bubble theory, focusing on the filter functions of algorithms to consider the impacts of ICT on the ideas and behaviors of people. This paper aims to interpret his theory from the viewpoint of psychoanalysis. This approach will enable us to deepen our understanding of personalization problems.
It is said that many people assume search engines are unbiased. Pariser doubts this belief and claims that search engines may be increasingly biased to share their views in the era of personalization. Democracy requires people to see things from one another’s point of view, but they are enclosed in their filter bubbles, Pariser says. They are offered parallel but separate universes. This can be one of the leading causes of social division undermining the public.
Pariser refers to research on curiosity in psychology by George Loewenstein.
Loewenstein explains that awareness of an information gap is a necessary precondition for experiencing curiosity. This is a gap between what one knows and what he/she wants to know. Pariser points out that one feels curiosity when he/she is conscious that something is being hidden. However, he/she will not be compelled to learn about what he/she does not know if the filter bubble hides things invisibly.
This explanation focuses on the character of personal recognition, but it is also
necessary to analyze the relationship between people and society for our deeper
understanding of personalization problems. A psychoanalytic perspective, especially the one based on Lacanian psychoanalysis, shows how personal recognition is linked to others and society. According to Jacques Lacan, a symbolic order based on language assures the stability of the ego as the imaginary. Both the symbolic and the imaginary aspects of a psychoanalytic subject come from others. An infant imitates others, which is acquiring language and developing his/her ego.
The subject must be oriented toward the idealized other as the object of identification. He/she assumes that the idealized other should know what he/she wants to know, which is called metastases. This shows that the gap between what one knows and what he/she wants to know as a driving force is tinged with otherness. However, the desire to know what he/she wants to know will be eliminated easily if he/she uses search engines. He/she can satisfy his/her desire without shaping an identity based on metastases to the idealized other.
He/she will not actively pursue what he/she wants to know any longer in such a situation.
The filter bubble can promote this trend. Pariser defines personalization as building
an environment that consists entirely of the adjacent unknown, which will not shake one’s schemata but feel like new information. This tendency also means a crisis of the public because it can bring about the fragmentation of society and the polarization of social groups. As a result, one loses the opportunity to meet others who may know what he/she never knows. He/she avoids reconsidering undamentally his/her symbolic axis forming his/her perspective, which is an essential matter of psychoanalysis.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 社会科学ジャーナル
en : The Journal of Social Science

号 91, p. 47-67, 発行日 2024-03-29
出版者
出版者 国際基督教大学(ja)
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 04542134
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2024-05-13 01:14:56.817071
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3