WEKO3
アイテム
The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Academic Writing
https://doi.org/10.34577/0002000186
https://doi.org/10.34577/000200018698e95486-198d-4d5b-9fa0-770e517a2803
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2024-04-16 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Academic Writing | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.34577/0002000186 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
著者 |
Brooks, Daniel
× Brooks, Daniel |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Students spend a great deal of time reading, discussing, and analysing articles in the ELA Reader, and these articles likely influence the way students write. For this reason, choosing articles for the ELA Reader is an extremely important task. Since ELA teachers do not primarily teach content, decisions about what articles to publish in the reader should prioritise the quality of the writing rather than its content, but views vary about what constitutes good writing. This short article is an attempt to begin a conversation about the kind of articles that should be given to our tudents as required reading, by comparing samples placed into three categories: the good, the bad and the ugly. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 語学研究 en : Language Research Bulletin 号 38, p. 1-9, 発行日 2023-04-01 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 国際基督教大学(ja) | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09133615 |