WEKO3
アイテム
A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property
https://doi.org/10.34577/00000001
https://doi.org/10.34577/000000012b8b8751-625e-4ba5-97a5-628e6f14e6cc
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property (669.7 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-09-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00000001 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
Aycock, Brian Johnson
× Aycock, Brian Johnson |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | There are two distinct lines of thought which we can find in the early modern European discourse on the origin and justification of property. One is a conventionalist line represented by Grotius, Hobbes and Pufendorf. The other is a unilateralist one, which was hinted at by some Puritan colonists in America and came to be clearly formulated in the language of Locke. The former makes a mutual compact of human beings a necessary condition for the emergence and justification of property. The latter dispenses with the compact altogether, and claims that a unilateral acquisition of natural resources under certain favourable circumstances sufficiently explains and justifies property. It is Locke who proposed his unilateralist theory of appropriation as an alternative to the earlier conventionalism of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf. The purpose of this paper is to give a narrative of the development of post-Lockean unilateralism. It considers the works of Jean Barbeyrac, Gershom Carmichael, and Francis Hutcheson. It seeks to provide textual evidence to show that there is a significant line of continuity from Locke to Hutcheson, while it also involves the use of diverse strategies and arguments. Barbeyrac and Carmichael inherited Locke’s basic principles though they added one or two claims of their own. Hutcheson modified Locke’s unilateralism by combining his functionalist and humanitarian views with Locke’s insights. In the Inquiry Hutcheson seized upon the consequentialist part of Locke’s unilateralism, and recast it in terms of self- love and motives to industry. In the Short Introduction, he appealed to the general interest of all, but he focused more sharply on the sense of humanity or the lack of it by discussing the case where one intercepts the product of another’s honest labour. And in A System of Moral Philosophy, Hutcheson linked human labour to ‘the immediate feelings of our hearts’ as well as ‘the consideration of the general interest’. Despite the diverse views found in Hutcheson’s early and later works, it is possible to see that Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson are united in defending the unilateral mode of appropriation, and rejecting the claim of conventionalism. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 人文科学研究 : キリスト教と文化 号 43, p. 1-25, 発行日 2012-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 24346861 | |||||
