{"created":"2023-05-15T09:29:21.560047+00:00","id":2,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"c88dd7e7-03eb-43ee-bb9b-47d471df2a74"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"2","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000002","sets":["12:3:4:6"]},"author_link":["5"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2012-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"43","bibliographicPageEnd":"25","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"人文科学研究 : キリスト教と文化","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　There are two distinct lines of thought which we can find in the early\nmodern European discourse on the origin and justification of property.\nOne is a conventionalist line represented by Grotius, Hobbes and\nPufendorf. The other is a unilateralist one, which was hinted at by some\nPuritan colonists in America and came to be clearly formulated in the\nlanguage of Locke. The former makes a mutual compact of human beings\na necessary condition for the emergence and justification of property. The\nlatter dispenses with the compact altogether, and claims that a unilateral\nacquisition of natural resources under certain favourable circumstances\nsufficiently explains and justifies property. It is Locke who proposed\nhis unilateralist theory of appropriation as an alternative to the earlier\nconventionalism of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf.\n　The purpose of this paper is to give a narrative of the development\nof post-Lockean unilateralism. It considers the works of Jean Barbeyrac,\nGershom Carmichael, and Francis Hutcheson. It seeks to provide textual\nevidence to show that there is a significant line of continuity from Locke\nto Hutcheson, while it also involves the use of diverse strategies and\narguments. Barbeyrac and Carmichael inherited Locke’s basic principles\nthough they added one or two claims of their own. Hutcheson modified\nLocke’s unilateralism by combining his functionalist and humanitarian\nviews with Locke’s insights. In the Inquiry Hutcheson seized upon the\nconsequentialist part of Locke’s unilateralism, and recast it in terms of self-\nlove and motives to industry. In the Short Introduction, he appealed to the\ngeneral interest of all, but he focused more sharply on the sense of humanity\nor the lack of it by discussing the case where one intercepts the product of\nanother’s honest labour. And in A System of Moral Philosophy, Hutcheson\nlinked human labour to ‘the immediate feelings of our hearts’ as well as\n‘the consideration of the general interest’. Despite the diverse views found\nin Hutcheson’s early and later works, it is possible to see that Barbeyrac,\nCarmichael, and Hutcheson are united in defending the unilateral mode of\nappropriation, and rejecting the claim of conventionalism.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00000001","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国際基督教大学","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"24346861","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Aycock, Brian Johnson","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"5","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2013-09-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"01-下川.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"669.7 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property ","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2/files/01-下川.pdf"},"version_id":"b4af1269-bffe-469e-804d-225b87a8edaf"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["6"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2013-09-01"},"publish_date":"2013-09-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"2","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["A Brief History of Post-Lockean Unilateralism: Barbeyrac, Carmichael, and Hutcheson on Property"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-04T04:27:01.751048+00:00"}