ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. 社会科学研究所
  3. 社会科学ジャーナル
  4. 87号 (2020.3)

The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan

https://doi.org/10.34577/00004642
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004642
5aade331-7331-4143-abfc-005c247f59c5
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
The The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan (1.2 MB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2020-04-23
タイトル
タイトル The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/00004642
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 MACHADO, Daniel

× MACHADO, Daniel

WEKO 7254

en MACHADO, Daniel

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 ‘Until very recently, there was almost no discussion concerning marriage between same-sex couples in Japan.’ I have stated that a few times in my prior works not only because it is a widespread belief among Japanese legal scholars, but because during my master research, I looked into it and, indeed, I did not find any papers on the topic. The scarce literature almost forced me to change my research topic. Nevertheless, three years after I finished my master thesis, I randomly stumbled upon a paper referring to a prewar civil law handbook that apparently mentioned something about the issue. I quickly learned that it was merely the end of the thread of a legal discussion that stretched back to the very codification process of the Japanese civil code. Bringing back this lost discussion, identifying its origins in French Law, rediscovering its place within Japanese family law, and demonstrating its implications became the topic of my doctoral degree. In this paper, I summarize part of my findings concerning prewar Japan in an attempt to shed some light on a matter that appears to have been avoided by legal scholars in Japan: can Japanese marriage law as provided in the Civil Code really be construed as requiring sexual difference as a substantial condition for marriage? First, I analyze references to the issue in the codifying process (II). Next, I describe the scholarly discussions carried out from the end of the Meiji Era to the early 1940s, before the end of World War II (III). Finally, I make some remarks as to the meaning this seemingly old controversy may have with regards to the current discussion (IV).
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 社会科学ジャーナル

号 87, p. 109-123, 発行日 2020-03-31
出版者
出版者 国際基督教大学
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 04542134
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:47:25.857671
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3