WEKO3
アイテム
The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004642
https://doi.org/10.34577/000046425aade331-7331-4143-abfc-005c247f59c5
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-04-23 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The Lost Discussion on Sexual Difference in Marriage Law in Prewar Japan | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.34577/00004642 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
著者 |
MACHADO, Daniel
× MACHADO, Daniel |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | ‘Until very recently, there was almost no discussion concerning marriage between same-sex couples in Japan.’ I have stated that a few times in my prior works not only because it is a widespread belief among Japanese legal scholars, but because during my master research, I looked into it and, indeed, I did not find any papers on the topic. The scarce literature almost forced me to change my research topic. Nevertheless, three years after I finished my master thesis, I randomly stumbled upon a paper referring to a prewar civil law handbook that apparently mentioned something about the issue. I quickly learned that it was merely the end of the thread of a legal discussion that stretched back to the very codification process of the Japanese civil code. Bringing back this lost discussion, identifying its origins in French Law, rediscovering its place within Japanese family law, and demonstrating its implications became the topic of my doctoral degree. In this paper, I summarize part of my findings concerning prewar Japan in an attempt to shed some light on a matter that appears to have been avoided by legal scholars in Japan: can Japanese marriage law as provided in the Civil Code really be construed as requiring sexual difference as a substantial condition for marriage? First, I analyze references to the issue in the codifying process (II). Next, I describe the scholarly discussions carried out from the end of the Meiji Era to the early 1940s, before the end of World War II (III). Finally, I make some remarks as to the meaning this seemingly old controversy may have with regards to the current discussion (IV). | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 社会科学ジャーナル 号 87, p. 109-123, 発行日 2020-03-31 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 04542134 |