WEKO3
アイテム
比較政治学的観点から見た「安保法制強行採決」の性格の考察 ―理念型的な仮説概念としての“リーガル・クー”概念の提案―
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004637
https://doi.org/10.34577/0000463798160d3f-0c63-4f66-9e57-ab6a6ba0a880
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
比較政治学的観点から見た「安保法制強行採決」の性格の考察 ―理念型的な仮説概念としての“リーガル・クー”概念の提案― (1.3 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-04-22 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 比較政治学的観点から見た「安保法制強行採決」の性格の考察 ―理念型的な仮説概念としての“リーガル・クー”概念の提案― | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Examination of “Forced Passage of the Collective Defense Bill” from a Viewpoint of Comparative Politics -Suggestion of “Legal Coup Concept” as an Ideal-type Hypothetical Concept | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00004637 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
名嘉, 憲夫
× 名嘉, 憲夫 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 7245 | |||||
| 姓名 | NAKA, Norio | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Recently, books such as How Democracies Die suggested that even countries with formal democratic institutions experience decay or disfunction in their democratic processes. Recent Japanese political incidents appeared to confirm such observation. The “forced passage of the collective defense bill” of 2015 is one of the most controversial issues in recent Japan. Although many scholars specialized in constitution studies asserted that the collective defense bill was unconstitutional, the governing party forced the approval of the bill in the national Diet. The purposes of this paper are threefold. Firstly, the processes of passing the collective defense bill will be examined. Secondly, illegal political processes such as revolution and coup d’état, and the approval of the collective defense bill will be compared. Thirdly, the ideal types of illegal political process will be constructed. In order to analyze and understand the processes of the approval of the collective defense bill, concepts (and terms) such as “maneuver coup” and “legal coup” as an ideal type of hypothetical terms will be suggested. The appropriateness of concepts (and terms) such as “maneuver coup” and “legal coup” need to be further examined by positive case study research. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
社会科学ジャーナル en : The Journal of Social Science 号 87, p. 27-48, 発行日 2020-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0454-2134 | |||||
