WEKO3
アイテム
『ストーン・ブッチ・ブルース』における プライベートな医療アクセスとTS/TGの枠組み
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004603
https://doi.org/10.34577/000046034469bc69-be78-4f4f-b822-183e14ade255
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
『ストーン・ブッチ・ブルース』における プライベートな医療アクセスとTS/TGの枠組み (1.1 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-01-24 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 『ストーン・ブッチ・ブルース』における プライベートな医療アクセスとTS/TGの枠組み | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Private Access to Medicine in Stone Butch Blues and the Framework of Transsexual/Transgender | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00004603 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
山田, 秀頌
× 山田, 秀頌 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Since the emergence of transgender theory and the transgender movement, the two categories of transsexual and transgender have been a major point of confrontation in discussions about the bodies and identities of gender variant people. This paper discusses Leslie Feinberg’s novel Stone Butch Blues (1993), and the controversy between Jay Prosser and Judith Halberstam regarding the reading of its protagonist as another instance of this confrontation. Prosser positions the experience of the protagonist Jess, a stone butch, as a bodily narrative of a transsexual, while Halberstam frames it as representing a transgender masculinity which is not based on the distinction between lesbian butch and FTM transsexual. There is, however, an element that is easily overlooked in this oppositional framework of transsexual versus transgender: the relationship of Jess’s private access to medicine and the questions of class. As I argue in this paper, when people can access medical services related to gender reassignment without having to take the official route via a country’s public health system, the framework of transsexual versus transgender is only partially effective. For, under such circumstances, it is class rather than medical discourse and definitions, that frames the experience and process. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : ジェンダー&セクシュアリティ 号 14, p. 57-79, 発行日 2019-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 18804764 | |||||
