ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. ジェンダー研究センター
  3. ジェンダー&セクシュアリティ
  4. 12号(2017.3)

J・バトラーのジェンダー・パフォーマティヴィティとそのもうひとつの系譜

https://doi.org/10.34577/00004416
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004416
3354789a-7be3-4062-a693-6e3af0294424
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
fujitaka.pdf J・バトラーのジェンダー・パフォーマティヴィティとそのもうひとつの系譜 (9.2 MB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2018-12-06
タイトル
タイトル J・バトラーのジェンダー・パフォーマティヴィティとそのもうひとつの系譜
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル The Genealogy of Gender Performativity in J. Butler
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/00004416
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 藤高, 和輝

× 藤高, 和輝

WEKO 6787

ja 藤高, 和輝

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Gender performativity is the most famous and influential theory in Judith Butler. It questioned the sex/ gender distinction which some feminists took for granted at that time when Gender Trouble (1990) was published. This distinction regarded sex as the natural category on the one hand, gender as the cultural expression of sex on the other hand. It means naturalizing the dualistic representation of gender. On the contrary, Butler's performative theory suggested that sex is not a natural category, but is a fiction which is constructed by repeating gender performances. Through denaturalizing gender, her theory criticizes the representation of gender/ sexual minorities as "unnatural" and "abnormal," and seeks to theorize the way to make their survival possible.
This paper examines how gender performativity was theorized from the
1980s to Gender Trouble. Interestingly, her performative theory cannot be reduced to speech act theory, but it was also formed in relation to other theories; feminist/ queer theory and performance theory. Indeed, in her article "Performative Act and Gender Constitution" (1988) in which she referred to "performative" at first, Butler started from Simone de Beauvoir's text, The Second Sex, and then reread Beauvoir's idea of "gender as act" as "social performance" in performance theory. Moreover, she extended Beauvoir's argument of denaturalizing sex, referring to Gayle Rubin's study of kinship, Monique Wittig's theory of sex, and Esther Newton's analysis of Drag Queen.
Thus, her performative theory is found not only in the context of speech act theory, but also in contexts of feminist/ queer theory and performance theory. From this genealogical perspective, this article seeks to rethink gender performativity.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : ジェンダー&セクシュアリティ

号 12, p. 183-204, 発行日 2017-03-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 18804764
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:29:20.585115
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3