ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. ICU比較文化研究会
  3. ICU比較文化 (Print edition:PISSN 0389-5475 Online edition:EISSN 2760-1935)
  4. 第46号(2014)

カール・バルトの『ローマ書』における「神認識」 —第一版と第二版の比較研究—

https://doi.org/10.34577/00003994
https://doi.org/10.34577/00003994
0d5dce5f-0393-4e61-babb-2383c1362190
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
46-04kimura.pdf カール・バルトの『ローマ書』における「神認識」 —第一版と第二版の比較研究— (577.0 kB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2015-11-13
タイトル
タイトル カール・バルトの『ローマ書』における「神認識」 —第一版と第二版の比較研究—
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル “Erkenntnis Gottes” in Karl Barth’s The Epistle to the Romans: A Comparative Study of the First and Second Editions
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/00003994
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 木村, 里奈

× 木村, 里奈

WEKO 5352

ja 木村, 里奈

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The aim of this study is primarily to compare the first edition of Karl
Barth’s commentary on The Epistle to the Romans with the second edition, which
Barth himself regarded as the wholly revised version, and secondly to analyze
the theological background of the transition between these two editions. The
author employs Erkenntnis Gottes (knowledge of God) as a lens through which
to compare both editions. By emphasizing Erkenntnis Gottes, one can grasp the
essence of his work.
The first chapter examines how Erkenntnis Gottes was deployed in the first
edition. In this edition, the relation between God and man is characterized as
an immediate relationship, one that is das ergriffene Ergreifen (not only grasping,
but also being grasped). At the time of the Resurrection, the immediate
relationship between man and God was restored. In this relation, while the
distinction between God and humans is maintained, a divine nature within
humanity enables them to “grasp” God immediately, without having to reflect onthemselves.
The second chapter analyzes how Erkenntnis Gottes was developed in the
second edition. In this edition, Erkenntnis Gottes means to recognize God as being
unknowable. There is an “infinite qualitative distinction” between human beings
and God. Therefore, Jesus Christ, the revelation of God Himself, appeared in
history in the form of a paradox. This paradox made the gospel of God have to be
believed, rather than recognized. Therefore, in order to have faith, it is essential torecognize this paradox, which is the denial of the immediately recognized God.
Chapter three consists of two parts. The first part highlights the differences
and the commonalities between the two editions. In both editions, Barth proposes
seemingly opposite ideas about Erkenntnis Gottes: the immediate recognition of
God and the recognition of God as unknowable. As a result, the dynamism of
faith has different foundations in these two editions. In spite of such differences,
Barth keeps his contention that faith is a dynamic given by God at every single
moment. Hence the change in ideas about Erkenntnis Gottes emphasizes this
dynamism. The latter part of the third chapter explores Barth’s intention in
revising his commentary, referencing reviews given by Emil Brunner, Adolf
Jülicher and Paul Wernle. Brunner showed a positive response, while Jülicher
and Wernle harshly critisized Barth’s work. However, none of these thinkers
correctly understood Barth’s idea that humanity is absolutely and qualitatively
different from God: ‘World remains world. But God is God.’ To clear this
misunderstanding, Barth had to emphasize the dynamism of faith by reformingthe idea of Erkenntnis Gottes.
Theology in the 1920s saw a conflict between two generations: the liberalism
of the late nineteenth century and the dialectical theology of the early twentieth
century. Jülicher and Wernle belong to the former, and Barth and Brunner to
the latter. In conclusion, the meaning of Erkenntnis Gottes in the first edition
is “to grasp God immediately,” while in the second edition, it is “to recognize
God as unknowable.” Although these two editions seem entirely dissimilar,
Barth’s assertion that faith is given by God at every moment remains consistent.
Moreover, the second edition was the result of polishing this idea, in reaction to
the generational conflict in theology at that time.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : ICU比較文化

号 46, p. 65-90, 発行日 2014-03-31
出版者
出版者 国際基督教大学
言語 ja
ISSN (Online)
収録物識別子タイプ EISSN
収録物識別子 2760-1935
ISSN (Print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0389-5475
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:39:55.090327
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3