WEKO3
アイテム
カール・バルトの『ローマ書』における「神認識」 —第一版と第二版の比較研究—
https://doi.org/10.34577/00003994
https://doi.org/10.34577/000039940d5dce5f-0393-4e61-babb-2383c1362190
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
カール・バルトの『ローマ書』における「神認識」 —第一版と第二版の比較研究— (577.0 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2015-11-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | カール・バルトの『ローマ書』における「神認識」 —第一版と第二版の比較研究— | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | “Erkenntnis Gottes” in Karl Barth’s The Epistle to the Romans: A Comparative Study of the First and Second Editions | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00003994 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
木村, 里奈
× 木村, 里奈 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The aim of this study is primarily to compare the first edition of Karl Barth’s commentary on The Epistle to the Romans with the second edition, which Barth himself regarded as the wholly revised version, and secondly to analyze the theological background of the transition between these two editions. The author employs Erkenntnis Gottes (knowledge of God) as a lens through which to compare both editions. By emphasizing Erkenntnis Gottes, one can grasp the essence of his work. The first chapter examines how Erkenntnis Gottes was deployed in the first edition. In this edition, the relation between God and man is characterized as an immediate relationship, one that is das ergriffene Ergreifen (not only grasping, but also being grasped). At the time of the Resurrection, the immediate relationship between man and God was restored. In this relation, while the distinction between God and humans is maintained, a divine nature within humanity enables them to “grasp” God immediately, without having to reflect onthemselves. The second chapter analyzes how Erkenntnis Gottes was developed in the second edition. In this edition, Erkenntnis Gottes means to recognize God as being unknowable. There is an “infinite qualitative distinction” between human beings and God. Therefore, Jesus Christ, the revelation of God Himself, appeared in history in the form of a paradox. This paradox made the gospel of God have to be believed, rather than recognized. Therefore, in order to have faith, it is essential torecognize this paradox, which is the denial of the immediately recognized God. Chapter three consists of two parts. The first part highlights the differences and the commonalities between the two editions. In both editions, Barth proposes seemingly opposite ideas about Erkenntnis Gottes: the immediate recognition of God and the recognition of God as unknowable. As a result, the dynamism of faith has different foundations in these two editions. In spite of such differences, Barth keeps his contention that faith is a dynamic given by God at every single moment. Hence the change in ideas about Erkenntnis Gottes emphasizes this dynamism. The latter part of the third chapter explores Barth’s intention in revising his commentary, referencing reviews given by Emil Brunner, Adolf Jülicher and Paul Wernle. Brunner showed a positive response, while Jülicher and Wernle harshly critisized Barth’s work. However, none of these thinkers correctly understood Barth’s idea that humanity is absolutely and qualitatively different from God: ‘World remains world. But God is God.’ To clear this misunderstanding, Barth had to emphasize the dynamism of faith by reformingthe idea of Erkenntnis Gottes. Theology in the 1920s saw a conflict between two generations: the liberalism of the late nineteenth century and the dialectical theology of the early twentieth century. Jülicher and Wernle belong to the former, and Barth and Brunner to the latter. In conclusion, the meaning of Erkenntnis Gottes in the first edition is “to grasp God immediately,” while in the second edition, it is “to recognize God as unknowable.” Although these two editions seem entirely dissimilar, Barth’s assertion that faith is given by God at every moment remains consistent. Moreover, the second edition was the result of polishing this idea, in reaction to the generational conflict in theology at that time. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : ICU比較文化 号 46, p. 65-90, 発行日 2014-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 03895475 | |||||
