WEKO3
アイテム
地を割るポセイドン —『エイコネス』II.14, 16, 17—
https://doi.org/10.34577/00003992
https://doi.org/10.34577/00003992d3d1a62b-22ae-4416-9bfa-cbeb08b2506f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
地を割るポセイドン —『エイコネス』II.14, 16, 17— (523.3 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2015-11-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 地を割るポセイドン —『エイコネス』II.14, 16, 17— | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Earth-opening Poseidon: Descriptions in Eikones II.14, 16, 17 | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34577/00003992 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
山口, 京一郎
× 山口, 京一郎 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Elder Philostratus’ Eikones contains a series of ekphrasis of paintings concerning the division of land by Poseidon: II.14 “Thessaly,” II.16 “Palaemon,” and the second island and the third-fourth islands in II.17 “Islands.” This article discusses the composition and links between these parts, concentrating on Poseidon and geographical change, along with their meaning. The formation of the vale of Tempe by Poseidon is described in II.14 “Thessaly:” Poseidon is in a threatening posture while breaking mountains, and his attitude to the emerging plain is welcoming. Also mentioned in “Palaemon” and the third-fourth islands, the story connects these three parts. The opening of the sacred depth of Isthmus of Corinth and its acceptance of Melicertes is depicted in II.16 “Palaemon,” with Poseidon’s order to open the land and his smile at Melicertes. The second island in “Islands” (II.17.3) does not contain a story of geographical change, but the statue of Poseidon in the painting is described as though it is sailing through the ground by breaking it. The thirdfourth islands (II.17.4) were formerly joined as one, but were broken apart into two, like Tempe. Though the description of the islands does not contain Poseidon,the preceding island and the mention of Tempe having earthquakes recalls its source, Earth-opening Poseidon, or Earth-shaking Poseidon. At the same time, the way of illustrating Tempe here is differs from that in “Thessaly.” Thus, the illustration in the third-fourth islands becomes a supplementary explanation for “Thessaly.” These connections are supported by the verbal link with rJhvgnumi ‘tobreak, break asunder.’ The second island and the third-fourth islands also have a unity owing to its composition. These four parts of geographical stories allow us to read them in reference to each other. Viewing the series on Poseidon and the division of land, we find that they share a connection to each other, and the image of the rather gentle grace of Poseidon or geographical change that sometimes shown long after its rupture. In addition, human activity could have participated in making the rupture appear graceful. In the third-fourth islands, the divided islands look unified due to a bridge, and wagons go over it, while ships sail under it. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : ICU比較文化 号 46, p. 23-46, 発行日 2014-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 国際基督教大学 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN (Online) | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2760-1935 | |||||
| ISSN (Print) | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0389-5475 | |||||
