ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. 社会科学研究所
  3. 社会科学ジャーナル
  4. 79号 (2015.3)

民営化の諸問題 ──航空管制の在り方に関する法制度比較を中心に──

https://doi.org/10.34577/00003311
https://doi.org/10.34577/00003311
6959d22e-0e8b-4400-bafa-943310aafb30
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
8-ICU_J79寺田ok.pdf 民営化の諸問題 ──航空管制の在り方に関する法制度比較を中心に── (714.5 kB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2015-04-13
タイトル
タイトル 民営化の諸問題 ──航空管制の在り方に関する法制度比較を中心に──
言語 en
タイトル
タイトル Issues in Privatization: Focusing on the Comparison of Legal Systems on Ways of Air Traffic Control System
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/00003311
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 寺田, 麻佑

× 寺田, 麻佑

WEKO 4902

ja 寺田, 麻佑

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Privatization generally means the transfer of ownership or business from the governmental organization to the private company. Recently, our society is called as a ‘Risk Society’. In this risk holding modern society, whether the government or public sector should undertake various business holds many problems. Should privatization be carried out completely in some fields? In other words, what kind of business should the government or public sector actually undertake? Would partial privatization ―usually outsourcing part of the business of the government― work? What kind of responsibility should it be if the government would partly outsource its business? The way of privatization and its application trigger many fundamental questions and issues.
This paper takes up air traffic control system among many fields where privatization becomes an issue. After looking at several countries’ air traffic control systems from a viewpoint of legal system (mainly Japan, the U.S., the U.K. and Germany), it considers the nature of the system and ways of preferable controlling of the air.Air-traffic control system varies depending on the country. For example, Japan and the U.S. are keeping the governmental control of the air with full responsibility to attached to the government and air traffic controllers are in charge of business as government officials. On the other hand, the U.K and Germany have adopted the system of outsourcing the business to organizations which could be owned by the private sector and the organization is in charge of air traffic control.It is difficult to say what kind of form is appropriate to a country, because each country has its own view and its way of thinking towards risk that the government should cover. There are many views including the clarification of where responsibility lies. It is an active issue what sector should receive liability claim and how to pay compensation when an accident occurs.
In this paper, as stated above, basic legal structure of air traffic control system of Japan, the U.S., the U.K. and Germany is compared from a perspective of ways of looking at the public service-what kind of business should be carried out by the government as a service by the public- in addition to a look at difference in the way of thinking about civil service system and the air traffic control system’s past, present and future perspective is examined.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 社会科学ジャーナル

号 79, p. 163-186, 発行日 2015-03-31
出版者
出版者 国際基督教大学
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 04542134
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:42:28.263966
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3