ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. キリスト教と文化研究所
  3. 人文科学研究
  4. 第55号 (2023.12)

Revisiting David Hume’s Review of the Rev. Robert Henry’s History of Great Britain: Illuminating Hume on Religion, Politics, and Modernity

https://doi.org/10.34577/0002000126
https://doi.org/10.34577/0002000126
dcea4086-0f4b-49ca-b91a-1a99620624e8
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
01Mark Revisiting David Hume’s Review of the Rev. Robert Henry’s History of Great Britain: Illuminating Hume on Religion, Politics, and Modernity (747 KB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2024-04-08
タイトル
タイトル Revisiting David Hume’s Review of the Rev. Robert Henry’s History of Great Britain: Illuminating Hume on Religion, Politics, and Modernity
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.34577/0002000126
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 Mark G. Spencer

× Mark G. Spencer

en Mark G. Spencer

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 It has been more than eighty years since E.C. Mossner first brought to the attention of modern scholars the pre-publication proof sheets of David Hume’s review of Volume Two of the Rev. Robert Henry’s The History of Great Britain, from the Invasion of it by the Romans under Julius Caesar. Written on a New Plan (1774). Intended for the Edinburgh Magazine and Review, Hume’s review was supressed by the journal’s editors. Why? Mossner speculated Hume’s critique was more favourable than the editors wanted. His account of Hume’s supposedly “kindly intended review” has been influential, being quietly absorbed as the unchallenged record. It’s time to revisit Hume’s review and to read it more closely than Mossner and those who have followed him did. Hume always expected diligent readers; in his review of Henry he provides them with an elaborate assessment. Unpacking Hume’s intricacies, we find him ironically playful and less praising than has been thought. When Hume’s review of Henry is
read closely—in the contexts of Henry’s History as a whole, Hume’s own History of England, and Hume’s telling final revisions to his History—we see he was quite critical of the core of Henry’s antiquarian account of England’s ancient times. And, all of this helps to illuminate Hume as the philosophical historian of the History of England, especially when it comes to the intertangled topics of religion, politics, and modernity. The essay concludes by fleshing out additional context offered by another anonymous Humean review, one which the author submits might usefully be seen as a companion piece to Hume’s review of Henry.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 人文科学研究:キリスト教と文化
en : Humanities : Christianity and Culture

号 55, p. 1-32, 発行日 2023-12-15
出版者
出版者 国際基督教大学(ja)
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 24346861
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2024-04-08 01:21:23.295430
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3