The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences

The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences 利用統計を見る

File / Name	License
The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History:Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences	Creative Commons : 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止
The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History:Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences (1.45MB) [ 1378 downloads ]	Creative Commons : 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止
オープンアクセス

JaLC DOI	info:doi/10.34577/00003934
アイテムタイプ	紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper
言語	英語
著者	Römer Thomas C.
抄録	This article deals with the current debate about the so-called “Deuteronomistic History” (DtrH). It presents the different positions in Old Testament scholarship and argues for a model that takes into account as many observations as possible brought forward by the tenants of different positions. An analysis of Deut 12 shows that there is indeed evidence that one should distinguish in the dtr edition of the books from Deuteronomy to Kings three main layers and eras: a first dtr edition in the 7th century BCE, a second revision dealing with the problems of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem during the 6th century and a last revision in the first half of the Persian period in a segregationist perspective. This threefold edition can also be detected in three different conclusions of the DtrH. When Deuteronomy was cut off from the following books in order to become the conclusion of the Pentateuch, it underwent a redaction that emphasizes its function as the last book of the Torah.
雑誌名	人文科学研究（キリスト教と文化）
号	46
ページ	43 - 66
発行年	2015-03-31
出版者	国際基督教大学キリスト教と文化研究所
ISSN	0073-3938