@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004035,
 author = {Römer, Thomas C.},
 issue = {46},
 journal = {人文科学研究 : キリスト教と文化},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This article deals with the current debate about the so-called
“Deuteronomistic History” (DtrH). It presents the different positions in
Old Testament scholarship and argues for a model that takes into account
as many observations as possible brought forward by the tenants of
different positions. An analysis of Deut 12 shows that there is indeed
evidence that one should distinguish in the dtr edition of the books from
Deuteronomy to Kings three main layers and eras: a first dtr edition in the
7th century BCE, a second revision dealing with the problems of the
destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem during the 6th century and a last
revision in the first half of the Persian period in a segregationist
perspective. This threefold edition can also be detected in three different
conclusions of the DtrH. When Deuteronomy was cut off from the
following books in order to become the conclusion of the Pentateuch, it
underwent a redaction that emphasizes its function as the last book of the
Torah.},
 pages = {43--66},
 title = {The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences},
 year = {2015}
}