{"created":"2023-05-15T09:33:21.902825+00:00","id":5458,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"f7717fcf-5336-46e6-b755-0edaf5d8fab1"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"5458","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5458"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005458","sets":["12:26:19:583"]},"author_link":["8422"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2023-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"90","bibliographicPageEnd":"98","bibliographicPageStart":"77","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"社会科学ジャーナル","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Controlling privacy is important in communication with social media such as SNS (Social Networking Service). However, it is difficult for young people, especially teens, to succeed in doing so in many cases. The aim of this paper is to consider this difficulty by focusing on the relationship between the plurality of the contexts of privacy and information ethics.Some information ethicists claim the importance of the norms which can be applied to every context, which is a universalistic view, while the contexts of privacy are plural. Helen Nissenbaum points out the flow of information can be appropriate when its context is integrated. She says that almost everything happens in a context, whose integrity should be governed by norms. Contextual integrity is maintained when two types of norms are upheld, that is, norms of appropriateness and norms of distribution.Young people try to control the flow of information when they communicate with SNSs, but they do not necessarily succeed in their attempts. One of the main causes of this difficulty is the network status of contemporary public, as danah boyd discusses. The flow of information will be maintained as long as the true audience matches their imagined audience. For example, they upload pictures in the scene of playing a plank addressed to their friends as their imagined audience, but their parents and teachers who do not necessarily share their context may find the pictures, which is called context collapse.There are several strategies to avoid context collapse, such as using different SNSs for different contexts in accordance with the imagined audience. Of course, they can set their accounts private or block someone, but these choices may have a negative influence on their relationship. Another strategy young people often use is restricting information open to the public. The example given by boyd is creating a “light version” of one’s life, that is, sharing at least a little bit on SNSs affords one more privacy than sharing nothing at all. The appearance of unlimited sharing enables one to prevent the audience from asking about what is actually happening.However, boyd says that young people need to acquire the skills to be digitally savvy through active learning to control networked privacy properly. Privacy in the networked public is not a static construct but a process to have control over a social situation by managing the flow of information and its context. Therefore, applying the uniformed criteria paternalistically to every context is not useful anymore. Considering the plurality of the contexts, information ethics should be defined as a frame of reference that does not show one unique solution, with which people reconsider their contexts continuously through active learning so that they could achieve networked privacy.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00005235","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国際基督教大学","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"04542134","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"萩原, 優騎","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"8422","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-04-07"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"JSS90号4萩原.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"497.4 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"プライバシーの文脈の多元性と情報倫理の関係 ―SNSを用いたコミュニケーションに関する課題を中心として―","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5458/files/JSS90号4萩原.pdf"},"version_id":"f24d3f65-7a0e-4c02-af8a-d4559d38b529"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"プライバシーの文脈の多元性と情報倫理の関係 : SNSを用いたコミュニケーションに関する課題を中心として","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"プライバシーの文脈の多元性と情報倫理の関係 : SNSを用いたコミュニケーションに関する課題を中心として","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"The relationship between the plurality of the contexts of privacy and information ethics : focusing on the problems of communication with SNS","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["583"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-04-07"},"publish_date":"2023-04-07","publish_status":"0","recid":"5458","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["プライバシーの文脈の多元性と情報倫理の関係 : SNSを用いたコミュニケーションに関する課題を中心として"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-09-29T07:02:45.592092+00:00"}