@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005421,
 author = {Edwards, Susan and Evans, Simon},
 issue = {37},
 journal = {語学研究},
 month = {Apr},
 note = {With the advent of the internet and online databases, contemporary university students are faced with a plethora of potential sources for their work. With online sources in particular, however, it is essential that students can appraise them for reliability. To do so successfully, they need to develop a clear and somewhat sophisticated understanding of the borderline between reliability and unreliability. This paper reflects on the introduction of an annotated bibliography in the Winter Term 2021–2022 as part of the Academic Reading and Writing (ARW) course at International Christian University (ICU) in Tokyo. The task had several aims, one of which was to develop students’ abilities to identify reliable sources correctly. Overall, the majority of sources found were reliable. However, the task also highlighted some of the gaps in student understanding of this issue as a result of the complexities and subtleties of appraising sources.},
 pages = {83--93},
 title = {Annotated bibliography : thinking critically about sources},
 year = {2022}
}