@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004790,
 author = {Smith, Guy},
 journal = {語学研究},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {This paper looks at some of the potential benefits peer review offers and some
of the difficulties. It examines my attempts to develop and trial a teaching
approach activating the advantages and mitigating the potential difficulties
involved in peer review. It also considers how to address culturally specific
challenges possibly inhibiting successful peer review for Japanese students.
The approach is described in a cycle of four demarcated steps: (a) the reviewer
commenting on observable facts, (b) the reviewer adding appropriate advice,
(c) the reviewer adding praise and/or evaluation and (d) the reviewee
reevaluating the essay in light of the feedback and analyzing options.
Classroom observations and feedback from students in tutorials suggest this
approach and the system of steps seem to facilitate smoother and more
effective peer review and assist in developing writing revision skills. This
could be due to the construction of a shared understanding for the peer review
process by using the four-step framework.},
 pages = {47--53},
 title = {Introducing A Peer Review System Targeting Shared Understanding and Actionable Feedback},
 volume = {34},
 year = {2019}
}