{"created":"2023-05-15T09:32:43.754515+00:00","id":4612,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"e6a81690-3c64-4093-9728-0d50850f3b0c"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"4612","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4612"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004612","sets":["12:2:10:481"]},"author_link":["6885"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2019-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"61","bibliographicPageEnd":"22","bibliographicPageStart":"11","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"教育研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　グライス（1989）は発話の意味を「言ったこと」と含意とに区別し、後者を更に、会話の含意と慣用\n的含意とに区別した。会話の含意は協調の原理をもとに、また慣用的含意は語彙的要素や構文をもとに\n生成される。これとは独立して、ストローソン（1950/2013）によって、断定と対照される概念として前\n提の概念が紹介された。前提は、語彙的要素や構文をもとに生成されるものと、会話的要素をもとに生\n成されるものとがある。そこで問題となるのが、含意と前提の関係である。文献ではこの問題について\nさまざまな見解が示されている。特に、意味のオントロジーにおける慣用的含意の位置づけは明確化の\n余地がある。本稿は、慣用的含意を引き起こす表現の主な候補（supplements, expressives, therefore,\nmanage to, only, stop ~ing）について調べ、慣用的含意と前提の関係を議論する。慣用的含意と前提はと\nもに独立した概念を形成するが、その定義と性質には明確化の余地があることがわかった。\n","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"　Grice (1989) divided the meaning of an utterance into what is said (“explicature”) and what is implicated (“implicature”), and the latter in turn he divided into conversational implicature and conventional implicature. Conversational implicatures are generated on the basis of cooperative principles, whereas conventional implicatures are generated on the basis of lexical items or constructions. Independently of this, the notion of presupposition was introduced by Strawson (1950/2013) as contrasting with assertion. Some presuppositions are triggered by lexical items or constructions and others by conversational factors. A question then is the relation between implicature and presupposition. The literature presents different views on this matter. In particular, the status of conventional implicature in the ontology of meaning leaves room for clarification. This paper investigates major candidates for the triggers of conventional implicatures (i.e., supplements, expressives, therefore, manage to, only, stop ~ing) and discusses the relation between conventional implicatures and presupposition.\n　The notion and classification of presupposition vary in the literature, as does the treatment of conventional implicature. In order to examine the status of the expressions in question, the following criteria were used: the definition of conventional implicature provided by Potts (2005); the backgrounded property for presuppositions; and the constancy under negation test for presuppositions. It was found that both conventional implicature and presupposition deserve an independent label but their definition and properties leave room for clarification.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00004454","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"04523318","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"水田, 洋子","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"6885","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-04-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"02.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"2.5 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"慣用的含意と前提","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4612/files/02.pdf"},"version_id":"027cb378-13c7-4c49-aa94-17a715642c82"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"慣用的含意と前提","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"慣用的含意と前提","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Conventional Implicature and Presupposition","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["481"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2019-04-01"},"publish_date":"2019-04-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"4612","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["慣用的含意と前提"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-02T02:25:33.328769+00:00"}