{"created":"2023-05-15T09:32:40.729390+00:00","id":4553,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"6c4625df-09e6-4c4d-b09c-c3245a8287a9"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"4553","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4553"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004553","sets":["12:48:53:475"]},"author_link":["6767"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2016-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"11","bibliographicPageEnd":"174","bibliographicPageStart":"149","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"ジェンダー&セクシュアリティ","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":" Resonating with early queer theory's motifs such as appropriation, Lee\nEdelman's No Future or its central theme, queer negativity, has received not\nonly applause but also fair criticism, and thereby occupied one of the central\npositions in recent queer theory. In response to such criticism, Edelman\nclarifies that the negativity he proposes should not be equated with the\nsimple negation of particular political positions, and its refusal of “positive\nidentity” should rather be directed to the identity principle on which our\nwhole society rests. Although such a radical challenge to positive identity\ncannot be underestimated, we might question whether such a drive-like,\namorphous queer resistance tacitly preserves or rehabilitates the positive\nidentity it purports to negate. It should also be asked how, while criticizing\nsuch an insidious risk, we can reframe queer negativity.\nIn order to answer these questions, this paper firstly examines the\nsimilarities between the argument of queer negativity and that of French\nfeminist theory, focusing on the concept of improper subject; both\narguments, relying on Lacanian psychoanalysis, insist on dis (ap) propriation\nof identity.\nAfter demonstrating their connection, the second section of this paper\nexplores the criticism offered by Gayatri C. Spivak of such insistence on the\ndivided subject, and, by doing so, marks the risk that the argument of queer\nnegativity might entail. This section first considers her criticism against\nJacqueline Rose. Based on Derridean affirmative deconstruction and his\nuse of catachresis, Spivak proposes to understand the subjectivity of the\ndecentered subject not as a privileged right but as “a bind to be watched”.\nShe also warns against Rose’s reduction of the difference between the\nontico-epistemological subject and the ethicopolitical subject. Through a \nreading of such criticism, this paper suggests that an argument like that\nof Rose implicitly obliterates the trace of the wholly-other, which is only\nnoticeable by attending to the catachresis “woman”, and that it reintroduces\nthe sovereign subject.\nThe latter part of the second section connects such metaphysical\narguments with the political analysis also made by Spivak. This part\nexplores the criticism against Foucault / Deleuze, focusing on (A) the status\nof the “desire” as catachresis and (B) the inattention to the gap between\ndescriptive representation and political representation, which can be\nrespectively compared with (A’) the status of the catachresis “woman” and\n(B’) the reduction of the difference between the ontico-epistemological\nsubject and the ethicopolitical subject. The inattention to the gap between\nDarstellung and Vertrerung leads to, according to Spivak, the perpetuation of\nbourgeois ideology. Functioning with that kind of ideology, the confusion of\nthe desire of the empirical instance with that of the transcendental instance\nrehabilitates the S / subject and implicitly preserves the transparent subject\nof the theorists. This paper, based on the similarities between the argument\nof queer negativity and that of the French feminist theory demonstrated\nearlier, lastly directs the criticism on French theory offered by Spivak to the\nargument of queer negativity. It concludes that queer negativity is to be\n“watched” in order to affirm the radical negativity of the other.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00004398","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"18804764","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"羽生, 有希","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"6767","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-11-29"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"CGSjnl011_04_Hanyu.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"クィア・ネガティヴィティの不可能な肯定 ―固有/適切でない主体の脱構築的批評","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4553/files/CGSjnl011_04_Hanyu.pdf"},"version_id":"10d2d9a4-57aa-4e29-8b3e-bf2ad036c446"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"クィア・ネガティヴィティの不可能な肯定 ―固有/適切でない主体の脱構築的批評","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"クィア・ネガティヴィティの不可能な肯定 ―固有/適切でない主体の脱構築的批評","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"The Impossible Affirmation of Queer Negativity: A Deconstructive Critique of Improper Subjects","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["475"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2018-11-29"},"publish_date":"2018-11-29","publish_status":"0","recid":"4553","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["クィア・ネガティヴィティの不可能な肯定 ―固有/適切でない主体の脱構築的批評"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-02T02:43:52.715605+00:00"}