@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004523,
 author = {高内, 悠貴},
 issue = {10},
 journal = {ジェンダー&セクシュアリティ},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The infamous U.S. military policy toward gay soldiers, “Don’t Ask Don’t
Tell,” was repealed in 2011. Many celebrated a big victory for the LGBT
movement, saying, “now gay soldiers can serve openly and honestly. “
However, was “the right to serve” really what LGBT communities asked for?
Looking back on the history of the LGBT movement in the U.S., “the right to
serve” was not always the self-evident goal for the movement.
　This article analyzes the gay liberation movement in the U.S. in the early
1970s, which actively engaged in the anti-Vietnam War movement and
tried to resist against the draft. Using a historical approach, I examine the
activism by the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) chapters in California. I
demonstrate how the military policy that discriminated against gays as
being unfit for service made the gay liberation movement’s strategy
toward the anti-draft resistance different from the one by straight men. In
order to radically resist against the military draft policy, GLFers chose to
come out as gay and dared to be classified as 4-F deferment (unfit for
service). Their resistance against the draft through coming out originated
from their belief in the radical potential of coming out to change a
homophobic society.
　However, their strategy had two problems. The first was the double bind
they faced when they needed to criticize both the military’s discriminatory
policies and the military itself. Though they ultimately wanted to ban the
military, they also needed to prove their ability to serve and improve
conditions for gay soldiers. Unable to handle this double bind situation,
GLF yielded to the Gay Activist Alliance (GAA), which claimed the necessity
of concentrating their time and energy exclusively on issues directly related
to the gay community. The second problem was their difficulty in taking 
differences among the gay community into consideration in creating their
strategy against the draft. Because of institutionalized racism and classism
in the military, coming out did not always secure the 4-F deferment,
especially for people of color and working class gay men.
　In conclusion, I situate the gay liberation movement’s efforts to oppose
the Vietnam War and resist against the draft in the history of the LGBT
movement in the U.S. I trace how GAA’s single-issue movement of claiming
their right as U.S. citizens resulted in the patriotic claim for “the right to
serve” in the 1990s and thereafter.},
 pages = {5--31},
 title = {「従軍する権利」をめぐるダブルバインド： 1970年代アメリカ合衆国におけるゲイ解放運動とベトナム反戦運動},
 year = {2015}
}