@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004046, author = {柴田, 真希都}, issue = {46}, journal = {人文科学研究 : キリスト教と文化}, month = {Mar}, note = {Characteristics and Historical Significance of Uchimura Kanzo’s Study of the Hebrew Prophets: With Aid from Robert N. Bellah  The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to clarify the characteristics of the study of the Hebrew Prophets by Uchimura Kanzo, who is called “a prophet in the modern era” both in Japan and abroad. Second, this paper also attempts to show the significance of his study on the Prophets in the history of Japanese thought in the light of Robert N. Bellah’s concept “prophetic individualism”.  In Section 1, I examine this concept of Bellah. About half a century ago he introduced this concept in his discussion on “political loyalty” and “the resistance to power” in the history of Japan’s modernization. More attention needs to be paid to the implications of the fact that, at the end of this discussion, Bellah gives special regard to Uchimura and his role in Japan’s history of “prophetic individualism”. In Section 2, I turn my discussion to Uchimura’s study of the Prophets. Its aim is to show that his presentation of each Prophet’s personality and actions is quite multifaceted in approach and rich in content. Section 3 presents three notable images of the Prophets, which are found in Uchimura’s study. Those images are: Prophets as revolutionaries or progressivists; Prophets as “the friend of humankind” in the sense that they severely criticized people for their unmoral behavior; and, Prophets as the instrument of God as a result of being called by Him against their own will.  In the following two sections I examine Uchimura’s political and social thought by focusing upon (1) his critique of patriotism and (2) his pacifist thought; both of which are closely linked to his study of the Prophets. Section 4 considers Uchimura’s critique of his contemporaries’ idea of patriotism and his own alternative to it. My aim is to explain the reasons why he regarded the patriotism of the Prophets as the best alternative for leading each nation to a morally right direction. In Section 5, I give the examples of how Uchimura’s interpretation of the images of the Prophets in the Old Testament is related to his analysis of peace issues. These examples prove, I argue, that in his pacifist thought the images of his Prophets constitute not only the models for him to be followed in order to show an absolute faith in God, but also the starting points to discover what human beings must do as their duty in this real world.  In Section 6, the relation of Uchimura’s study of the Prophets with his social realism is examined on the basis of my discussion above. Referring to Bellah’s concept of “prophetic individualism” again, I demonstrate that Uchimura was well aware of the limits of human nature but, at the same time, founded his hope on the historical potentials which he detected in “the courage to stand utterly alone” from the Prophets in his study. This recognition played a key role, I argue, in Uchimura’s realistic judgment of social situations in his contemporary period. The virtues shown by the Prophets as well as their courage to fulfill their own duties led Uchimura to follow the footsteps of those predecessors in his own public life. This is one of the most significant legacies that he left in Japan’s history of ethics.}, pages = {(117)--(163)}, title = {内村鑑三における預言者研究の特色とその思想史的意義──ロバート・N・ベラーの議論をてがかりに──}, year = {2015} }