@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004036,
 author = {Graham, Gordon},
 issue = {46},
 journal = {人文科学研究 : キリスト教と文化},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {In the period of the Scottish Enlightenment the term ‘natural religion’
was used to refer to two important different phenomena – theological
beliefs based on evidence drawn from the natural world, and the religious
impulses that can be found ‘implanted’ in human nature. This paper takes
two works by David Hume as exemplifying this difference. It critically
investigates what Hume has to say about natural religion in the second
sense, and compares it with the approach of his friend and contemporary
Adam Smith. The paper argues that, though in general the two
philosophers have much in common, on the matter of the place of religion
in human nature, and its social accommodation, they differ significantly,
and a case is made for thinking that Smith’s account of religion is superior
to Hume’s.},
 pages = {67--88},
 title = {Natural Theology and Natural Religion in the Scottish Enlightenment},
 year = {2015}
}