@article{oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002568,
 author = {五十嵐, 舞},
 issue = {9},
 journal = {Gender and Sexuality},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {Using Judith Butler’s theory of subjectivity, this paper discusses views of
the variation in Alice as a subject. This variation is an attempt to blur both
the boundary and the relationship between an incoherent body in a
“curious” world and our bodies as we exist in the real world.
　The film “Alice in Wonderland” takes place 13 years later than the
children’s novel Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass.
Underland is still regarded as a “curious” world（when Alice was young,
she misheard “Wonderland” as “Underland,” so she calls it Underland in the
movie）. Alice’s arrival in Underland was anticipated; the Savior Alice was
foreseen as a girl who would defeat the evil and bring peace to the
Underland. Thus, Alice, who is lost there, is asked if she is the “Alice.”
Despite her initial firm denial, residents there are intent upon calling her
“Alice.” Ultimately, she defeats evil, which conforms to the prophesied
image of “Alice.”
　In the film, the repeated question “who are you?” and the difficulty of
answering that question adequately, as well as describing the body with
phrases such as “not hardly” and “almost” appear “curious” to the viewer.
However, if one analyzes using different perspectives, including Butler’s
theory of performativity, it becomes clear that that “curiousness” relates to
our bodies in the real world, rather than merely the world of the fantastic.},
 pages = {169--185},
 title = {「期待」どおりになれないわたしの可能性 ―J・バトラーの主体化理論から『アリス・イン・ワンダーランド』を読む},
 year = {2014}
}