{"created":"2023-05-15T09:30:53.067072+00:00","id":2027,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"6b09b02e-b4ff-414e-8d59-f5b5e4800c38"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"2027","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2027"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002027","sets":["12:27:54:66"]},"author_link":["3405","3404","3403"],"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1996-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"5","bibliographicPageEnd":"62","bibliographicPageStart":"45","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"ICU 日本語教育研究センター紀要"},{"bibliographic_title":"The Research Center for Japanese Language Education Annual Bulletin","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"坪根, 由香里"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3403","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"ツボネ, ユカリ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3404","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"TSUBONE, Yukari","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3405","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　「ことだ」のモダリティは(1)「XはYだ」という構文の「Xは」の部分は話し手・聞き手双方が認識可能な場合に省略され,「こと(だ)」はその省略された主題に対応するものとして存在する。また,(2)「ことだ」の各用法はその主題の復元のしやすさの程度に差があり,その程度によってそのモダリティ度にも違いがある。筆者はこの二つの仮説をたて,その検証を行った。(1)の仮説については話し手・聞き手双方が認識している事象についてのみ主題が省略され,それによって文が不完全なものになり,「ことだ」が色々な意味を持っているかのように見えるのだと考える。(2)の仮説については,「ことだ」には,それ自体強く一体化していてかなり高いモダリティ性を持つものと,形式名詞「こと」+ コピュラ「だ」とは言いにくいが,それに近く,モダリティ性はあまり感じられないがようなものがある。理由・根拠を表す用法はかなりモダリティ度が高いが,「ことだ」で助動詞として理由や根拠を表すというより,「こと」が「主観回避」的なニュアンスを加えていると考える。従って,言い換え・要約の用法→伝聞の用法→感嘆・感動を表す用法→「～することが大切/必要だ」の意味を表す用法,理由・根拠を表す用法の順で助動詞化が進み,これらは形式名詞「こと」+「だ」から助動詞化した「ことだ」への連続した線上に点在することを明らかにした。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　The purpose of this paper is to investigate the core meaning which accounts for the semantic diversity of KOTO-DA, and to inspect the degree of modality of each usage of KOTO-DA. The paper attempts to verify two hypotheses. The first hypothesis is that KOTO corresponds to the hidden \"theme\" in the KOTO-DA sentence. In the X wa Y-DA (～KOTO-DA) structure, X is omitted when it is understood by both speaker and hearer. Being left alone, Y-DA (～KOTO-DA) results in ambiguity depending on the context. The second hypothesis is that the hidden \"themes\" of certain usages are easier to restore than those of other usages, therefore, the degree of modality of each usage differs. This research found that all the usages of KOTO-DA ranged from the KOTO as a pseudo-noun plus the copula DA, to the KOTO-DA that has turned into an auxiliary verb as a whole. The range is as follows: paraphrasing → hearsay → exclamation → advice / grounds, reason. Out of this investigation about the range, I suggest that the KOTO of the KOTO-DA denoting grounds or reason should add the nuance that the speaker is uttering the sentence objectively, not subjectively.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00002013","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10391105","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_text_10":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"International Christian University"}]},"item_1_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"国際基督教大学日本語教育研究センター"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"1996-03-31"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00000193814.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"「ことだ」に関する一考察 ","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2027/files/KJ00000193814.pdf"},"version_id":"46a811cc-6797-4b74-ae2a-4e50afd20956"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"モダリティ","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"形式名詞","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"助動詞","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"主題","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"客観的","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「ことだ」に関する一考察 ―そのモダリティ性を探る―","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「ことだ」に関する一考察 ―そのモダリティ性を探る―"},{"subitem_title":"A Study of the Meanings of KOTO-DA ―Focusing on Degree of Modality―","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"3","path":["66"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"1996-03-31"},"publish_date":"1996-03-31","publish_status":"0","recid":"2027","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「ことだ」に関する一考察 ―そのモダリティ性を探る―"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-05-15T10:47:14.087417+00:00"}