{"created":"2023-05-15T09:29:28.075970+00:00","id":141,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"22ba02a1-27d3-4cdc-ad02-151a56809e69"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"141","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"141"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000141","sets":["12:27:28:30"]},"author_link":["5950","5951","127","126"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2010-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"6","bibliographicPageEnd":"24","bibliographicPageStart":"3","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"ICU 日本語教育研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"ICU Studies in Japanese Language Education","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　本稿では、テレビ映像を用いたインタビュー調査を３名の被験者を対象に実施し、「は\nい」「ええ」の使い分け、および「ええ」の機能について考察を試みた。調査の結果、先\n行研究および筆者らの考察結果が再確認されると共に、被験者から新たな示唆が得られた。\nまず、「はい」には、先行研究で言われているように、「フォーマルで丁寧」、「談話設\n立・維持・進行」の機能、「ええ」には「同意・共感」の機能があると認識されているこ\nとが確認された。さらに筆者らがこれまで考察してきた「主張を込める」、「既知の情報\nに対する応答」などの「ええ」の機能を認識していると思われる回答が見られた。\nまた「ええ」の認識には個人差があるということや、「はい」「ええ」どちらかのみを\n使うとその応答詞の持つ機能がマイナスに作用する結果になってしまうという側面も再\n確認された。「はい」のみならば「固い」、「楽しさがない」、「話しにくい」などの被験者\nのコメントに、それぞれの応答詞の機能がマイナスに現れてしまった様子が見てとれる。\nさらに、被験者は３名とも「はい」「ええ」を適宜織り交ぜて使用することが適切で自\n然だと指摘している。これは、先行研究および筆者らのこれまでの調査結果からは見出\nされなかった新しい点である。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"　This paper examined the difference in the usage of “hai” and “ee” and the function of\n“ee” through an interview survey of three subjects using T.V. programs.\nThe results are as follows. The subjects recognize that “hai” has the function of\nmaintaining a high level of formality and establishing and developing a conversation, and\nthat “ee” has the function of showing agreement and empathy. Further, the subjects\nrecognize that the function of “ee” as a response that actively expresses the speaker’s\nopinion and as a response to shared information among the speakers.\nWe confirm that the recognition of the function of “ee” differs with person, and that the\nfunction of “hai” and “ee” works negatively if only one is used. This can be seen from the\nsubjects’ comments as follows. If only “hai” is used, it would be “too formal,” “too\nserious,” and “unapproachable.” If “ee” is used exclusively, it would be “hard to see the end\nof a topic,” “annoying,” and “it will let a speaker talk endlessly.”\nFurther, all the subjects pointed out that it is natural and appropriate to use both “hai”\nand “ee” in a conversation. This has been indicated neither in previous studies nor in our\nprevious surveys.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"5950","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"NINOMIIYA, Rica"}]},{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"5951","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"KANAYAMA, Yasuko"}]}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国際基督教大学 日本語教育研究センター"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1880-0122","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"二宮, 理佳"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"126","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"金山, 泰子"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"127","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2014-01-10"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"6_01-1日本語教育研究_第6号_論文_二宮・金山.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"「はい」「ええ」の使い分けに関する考察","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/141/files/6_01-1日本語教育研究_第6号_論文_二宮・金山.pdf"},"version_id":"97ba07f4-f486-4d14-8e6b-6432d3ecb1a6"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"「ええ」の機能","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"テレビ映像を用いたインタビュー","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"使い分けの判断基準","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"マイナスの側面","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"応答表現のバリエーション","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「はい」「ええ」の使い分けに関する考察 －テレビ映像を使用したインタビュー調査を通して－","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「はい」「ええ」の使い分けに関する考察 －テレビ映像を使用したインタビュー調査を通して－"},{"subitem_title":"A Study of the Difference in the Usage or “hai” and “ee”  through an interview survey using T.V. programs","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["30"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2014-01-10"},"publish_date":"2014-01-10","publish_status":"0","recid":"141","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「はい」「ええ」の使い分けに関する考察 －テレビ映像を使用したインタビュー調査を通して－"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T09:44:07.362200+00:00"}