{"created":"2023-05-15T09:30:18.681514+00:00","id":1288,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"a43797c4-ddf6-460f-a2b5-8a1289d1c878"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1288","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1288"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001288","sets":["12:2:10:124"]},"author_link":["2385","2383","2384"],"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2008-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"50","bibliographicPageEnd":"210","bibliographicPageStart":"201","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国際基督教大学学報. I-A, 教育研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"Educational Studies","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"森島, 泰則"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2383","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"モリシマ, ヤスノリ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2384","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"MORISHIMA, Yasunori","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2385","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Singer(e.g.,1993)が提唱するvalidation modelによれば,因果的橋渡し推論が成立するためには,その推論が読み手の既有知識によって確認されなければならない.例えば,「ドロシーはアスピリンを飲んだ.痛みがなくなった.」という文章を理解するには,RELIEVE [ASPIRIN, PAIN]のような仲介命題が想起される必要がある.そして,この命題が既有知識によって確認されるのである.一方,そのような既有知識が存在しないか,容易に検索可能でない場合はどうか.本論文では,必要な知識が検索あるいは生成されるまで精緻化作業が行われ,その結果,因果的推論が生成・確認されるという仮説を立て,2つの実験によって検証した.第1実験は,読み手は文章の整合性を因果関係によって判断する傾向があること,また,一般的な既有知識によって因果関係が確立しない文章でも因果性が認められることを確認した.第2実験では,リーディング・タイムの計測によって,因果関係が弱い文章も因果関係が導かれるが,精緻化作業のための文処理時間が,因果性の高い文章より,余分にかかることを確認した.Kintsch(e.g,1998)の構築-統合モデルによって,この文処理過程を計算モデル的に議論する.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The validation model (e.g., Singer, 1993) claims that before a causal bridging inference is accepted, it must be validated by existing knowledge. For example, to understand \"Dorothy took the aspirins. Her pain went away,\" one first computes a mediating idea RELIEVE [ASPIRIN, PAIN]. Then, the truth of it is validated on the basis of existing knowledge. The present study examined the hypothesis that the causal inference would be drawn and validated even when particular knowledge that validates the mediating idea is not readily available because elaborations are done to retrieve or construct such knowledge. To test this hypothesis, two experiments were conducted. The first experiment showed that people tended to judge coherence of a text based on causal relations and that causality was indeed recognized in those texts in which the antecedent sentence and the consequence sentence were not linked by familiar knowledge. The second experiment involving reading times showed that while sentence processing time was longer for such texts than texts involving familiar knowledge, there was no difference between these types of texts in reading the subsequent sentence describing the validating idea. These results provided evidence supporting for the elaboration and validation of the causal bridging inference. Computational aspects of these processes are discussed based on Kintsch's (1998) Construction-Integration Model.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00001274","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN0008887X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_text_10":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"International Christian University"}]},"item_1_text_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"研究論文"}]},"item_1_text_3":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Research Article"}]},"item_1_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"国際基督教大学"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2008-03-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00005609064.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"854.9 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"文章理解における因果的橋渡し推論処理過程の精緻化","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1288/files/KJ00005609064.pdf"},"version_id":"5da7ca0c-976d-486d-a0ba-806013575d55"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"文章理解","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"推論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"精緻化過程","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"言語心理学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"text comprehension","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"inferences","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"elaboration process","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Psycholinguistics","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"文章理解における因果的橋渡し推論処理過程の精緻化","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"文章理解における因果的橋渡し推論処理過程の精緻化"},{"subitem_title":"Elaborations for the Validation of a Causal Bridging Inference in Text Comprehension","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"3","path":["124"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2008-03-01"},"publish_date":"2008-03-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"1288","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["文章理解における因果的橋渡し推論処理過程の精緻化"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-09-25T05:49:12.796625+00:00"}