{"created":"2023-05-15T09:30:14.130889+00:00","id":1188,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"ebef2c3a-be44-4757-8518-5524bd386a4f"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1188","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1188"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001188","sets":["12:2:10:121"]},"author_link":["2152","2151","2150"],"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2005-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"47","bibliographicPageEnd":"168","bibliographicPageStart":"157","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国際基督教大学学報. I-A, 教育研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"Educational Studies","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"森口, 和"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2150","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"モリグチ, カズ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2151","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"MORIGUCHI, Kazu","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2152","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In this paper, a paradigm shift in the history of family sociology was examined by reviewing three disputes. The disputes featured in this paper were the Ariga=Kitano dispute, the nuclear family dispute, and the individualization dispute. From the findings of past researches, it was predicted that foci on the inside of family would become strong, whereas considerations on external social factors surrounding family would be weakened. Through reviewing three disputes, it was confirmed that there were two perspectives in each dispute. One is a perspective considering inside of family, and another is a perspective considering family in relation to external were factors. By asserting legitimization of each perspective, the conflicts connected to disputes were taking place. Through comparing three disputes, a segmentation of analytic units and a deficiency of nowness, which were post-modernism oriented, were confirmed. A traditional family or a nuclear family was the analytic unit in the Ariga=Kitano dispute and the nuclear family dispute. On the contrary, family member itself was the analytic unit in the individuation dispute. The fact that analytic units were subdivided corresponds to the increase of foci on the inside the family. Moreover, the social factors surrounding family were assumed in the Ariga=Kitano dispute and the nuclear family dispute, and the relatively/ historically-extant external social factors were presumed in the individuation dispute conversely. Considering only on the relatively/ historically-extant external social factors means the deficiency of nowness, and leads to a reduction of speculation on external social factors. In this way, sinlar findings to past researches were confirmed by reviewing three disputes.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00001174","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN0008887X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_text_10":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Graduate School of Education, International Christian University"}]},"item_1_text_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"研究論文"}]},"item_1_text_3":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Research Article"}]},"item_1_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"国際基督教大学大学院教育学研究科"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2005-03-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00005608991.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.3 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"家族社会学史におけるパラダイム転換の一考察　―有賀・喜多野論争、核家族論争、個人化論争のレビューを通じて―","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1188/files/KJ00005608991.pdf"},"version_id":"142f115a-ee87-4e35-8095-33b97bdefff1"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"有賀・喜多野論争","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"核家族論争","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"個人化論争","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"パラダイム転換","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"The Ariga=Kitano dispute","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the nuclear family dispute","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the individuation dispute","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"paradigm shifts","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"家族社会学史におけるパラダイム転換の一考察─有賀・喜多野論争、核家族論争、個人化論争のレビューを通じて─","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"家族社会学史におけるパラダイム転換の一考察─有賀・喜多野論争、核家族論争、個人化論争のレビューを通じて─"},{"subitem_title":"A Consideration on Paradigm Shifts in the History of Family Sociology : Through Reviewing Ariga-Kitano Dispute, the Nuclear Family Dispute, and Individualization Dispute","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"3","path":["121"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2005-03-01"},"publish_date":"2005-03-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"1188","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["家族社会学史におけるパラダイム転換の一考察─有賀・喜多野論争、核家族論争、個人化論争のレビューを通じて─"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-09-25T05:50:55.911753+00:00"}