{"created":"2023-05-15T09:30:12.070401+00:00","id":1140,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"8b7db51a-f85c-4b06-9278-6bdac918d63e"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1140","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1140"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001140","sets":["12:2:10:120"]},"author_link":["2040","2039","2038"],"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2004-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"46","bibliographicPageEnd":"31","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国際基督教大学学報. I-A, 教育研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"Educational Studies","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"立川, 明"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2038","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"タチカワ, アキラ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2039","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"TACHIKAWA, Akira","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2040","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The present essay distinguishes, unlike a standard interpretation, the first two parts of the Yale Report as two entities which develop somewhat distintive arguments. In order to substantiate this thesis, the author will compare the second part written by James Kingsley with the controversies over classics education between the Edinburgh Review and Oxford around 1810, and the first part written by Jeremiah Day, with Kant's discussion on the conflict of the faculties around the end of the eighteenth century. The comparisons will reveal that Day insists on the superiority of collegiate education over professional as well as advanced vocational training by emphasizing the central place which the principles of science occupy in the collegiate curriculum. Also clarified will be the point that Kingsley's argument for classics education, despite the cherished theory of mental discipline, proves purely defensive like the case of Oxford against the Edinburgh Review.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34577/00001126","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN0008887X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_text_10":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"International Christian University"}]},"item_1_text_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"研究論文"}]},"item_1_text_3":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Research Article"}]},"item_1_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"国際基督教大学"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2004-03-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00005608943.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"科学と文芸 : イェイル・レポートを分かつもの","url":"https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1140/files/KJ00005608943.pdf"},"version_id":"ac215864-0be0-4b75-8327-d4c18a547e0c"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"イェイル・レポート","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"オックスフォード","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"『エディンバラ・レヴュー』","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"カント","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"古典語","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Yale Report","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Oxford","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the Edinburgh Review","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Kant","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Ancient Languages","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"科学と文芸 : イェイル・レポートを分かつもの","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"科学と文芸 : イェイル・レポートを分かつもの"},{"subitem_title":"Science and Literature : What Divides the Yale Report","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"3","path":["120"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2004-03-01"},"publish_date":"2004-03-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"1140","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["科学と文芸 : イェイル・レポートを分かつもの"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-09-25T05:52:21.633567+00:00"}