<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-03-07T09:45:27Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004933" verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004933</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-10-02T01:41:50Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>12:3:4:518</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>From Athens to Edo: Virtue, Law and Christian Ethics in Comparative Context</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Doak, Kevin M.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>7437</dc:creator>
          <dc:description>This article identifies two different traditions of understanding what
virtue is, both of which originated in ancient Greece but became global
in reach. One tradition is the Socratic understanding of virtue and the
other tradition is the Sophist understanding of virtue. After outlining the
distinguishing features of these different traditions and their historical,
philosophical and economic conditions, the article then turns to 17th century
Japan, finding advocates of these understandings of virtue in neo-Confucian
philosophers Itō Jinsai (1627-1705) and Ogyū Sorai (1666-1728). Arguing that
Jinsai’s understanding of virtue was akin to the Socratic tradition and Ogyū’s
was in line with the Sophist tradition, the article then raises the possibility
of Christian influences on Jinsai and shows how his understanding of virtue
was continued on for nearly two centuries in the Osaka merchant academy,
the Kaitokudō (1724-1869). This long tradition of privileging Socratic virtue
within the Kaitokudō helps explain the conversion of the son of the last
head of the Kaitokudō, Nakai Tsugumaro (1855-1943) to Christianity. In
a similar vein, one finds both the Socratic and Sophist understandings of
virtue in the Christian intellectual Nitobe Inazō’s early 20th century writing
on bushido. Finally, the article notes that without some mechanism for
reconciling these two opposing understandings of virtue, societies run the
risk of disintegration. The author concludes that the best hope for such
reconciliation lies in the field of law, since law by its very nature embodies
elements of both the Socratic and the Sophist understanding of virtue.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>departmental bulletin paper</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>国際基督教大学</dc:publisher>
          <dc:date>2019-12-15</dc:date>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>人文科学研究 : キリスト教と文化</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>51</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>15</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>34</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>00733938</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4933/files/03Kevin M Doak.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.34577/00004740</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4933</dc:identifier>
          <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
