WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "33c5eab4-63c9-4200-9822-71b44058393b"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 14, "id": "4586", "owners": [14], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "4586"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:icu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004586", "sets": ["479"]}, "author_link": ["6794"], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2017-09-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "84", "bibliographicPageEnd": "25", "bibliographicPageStart": "5", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "社会科学ジャーナル", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Terrible earthquake, tsunami and the corresponding nuclear accident\nhit the northeastern Japan in 2011, which is called the Great East Japan\nEarthquake. Some raised a question whether safety and security studies\nproposed by Yoichiro Murakami is useful after that. The purpose of this paper\nis to answer the question and seek its tasks and the possibility from the view\nof resilience studies. Creating a resilient society is one of the important aims\nin the contemporary Japan. Can safety and security studies function as a\nmethodology of achieving resilience?\nControlling nature with the power of science and technology has been\nan aim in modern society. However, science and technology itself became a\nthreat to human beings as a result of its development. It is necessary for them\nto control not only nature but also artifacts. According to Murakami, the origin\nof this situation is modern European thought which released people from premodern\nrestrictions such as religion. They took it for granted that they could\ndo everything depending on their desires. Moreover, science and technology\nstirred them. The more science and technology developed, the more they\nwanted its fruit. How can human desire be controlled in the contemporary\nsecularized society? Murakami answers that it will be impossible to control\ndesire without recognizing issues caused by science and technology as urgent\nones.\nMany of these issues are global. However, he points out human cultures\nand their values are various, while sustainability is a common goal all\nhuman beings should take collaborative efforts to reach. Researchers in the\nfield of resilience studies also say the way to achieve resilience, a basis of\nsustainability, differs from area to area though creating a resilient society is\na global common goal. One of the difficulties is how the local dimensions of\ndecision-making in each community can be connected to the global dimensions\nto address common global issues. Moreover, they have to consider how to\nresolve the conflicts among the areas and between the global benefits and the\nlocal ones. For example, a resilient state or safety and security in one area can\nbe harmful for others if the concerned area achieves resilience or safety and\nsecurity by discharging harmful substances to its outside.\nSafety and security studies can be a methodology to solve the problems\nmentioned above. Murakami proposes that people give up one unique solution\nwhen they make a decision. This means it is important they always take it into\nconsideration that all options they choose will be tentative. In other words,\nthey should always try to seek the better solutions to improve the situation.\nMurakami calls such sustained efforts dynamism of human thought and\nsociety. Dynamism is also a necessary condition to reconsider their truism in\ntheir daily life which prevents them from recognizing issues caused by science\nand technology as urgent ones. In this sense, a methodology of safety and\nsecurity studies will be effective to achieve resilience and sustainability.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.34577/00004429", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "04542134", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "萩原, 優騎", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "6794", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-01-07"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "1.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "803.4 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 803400.0, "url": {"label": "東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として―", "url": "https://icu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4586/files/1.pdf"}, "version_id": "fc92e375-9bf2-4d45-95c7-a02a859b8433"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として―", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として―", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Tasks and the Possibility of Safety and Security Studies after the Great East Japan Earthquake: As a Methodology of Creating a Resilient Society", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "14", "path": ["479"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.34577/00004429", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-01-07"}, "publish_date": "2019-01-07", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "4586", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として―"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として―
https://doi.org/10.34577/00004429
https://doi.org/10.34577/000044298f06ac7d-b357-4007-8d23-81a8087acd29
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として― (803.4 kB)
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2019-01-07 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | 東日本大震災後の安全学の課題と可能性 ― レジリエントな社会の実現のための方法論として― | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Tasks and the Possibility of Safety and Security Studies after the Great East Japan Earthquake: As a Methodology of Creating a Resilient Society | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.34577/00004429 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
著者 |
萩原, 優騎
× 萩原, 優騎 |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Terrible earthquake, tsunami and the corresponding nuclear accident hit the northeastern Japan in 2011, which is called the Great East Japan Earthquake. Some raised a question whether safety and security studies proposed by Yoichiro Murakami is useful after that. The purpose of this paper is to answer the question and seek its tasks and the possibility from the view of resilience studies. Creating a resilient society is one of the important aims in the contemporary Japan. Can safety and security studies function as a methodology of achieving resilience? Controlling nature with the power of science and technology has been an aim in modern society. However, science and technology itself became a threat to human beings as a result of its development. It is necessary for them to control not only nature but also artifacts. According to Murakami, the origin of this situation is modern European thought which released people from premodern restrictions such as religion. They took it for granted that they could do everything depending on their desires. Moreover, science and technology stirred them. The more science and technology developed, the more they wanted its fruit. How can human desire be controlled in the contemporary secularized society? Murakami answers that it will be impossible to control desire without recognizing issues caused by science and technology as urgent ones. Many of these issues are global. However, he points out human cultures and their values are various, while sustainability is a common goal all human beings should take collaborative efforts to reach. Researchers in the field of resilience studies also say the way to achieve resilience, a basis of sustainability, differs from area to area though creating a resilient society is a global common goal. One of the difficulties is how the local dimensions of decision-making in each community can be connected to the global dimensions to address common global issues. Moreover, they have to consider how to resolve the conflicts among the areas and between the global benefits and the local ones. For example, a resilient state or safety and security in one area can be harmful for others if the concerned area achieves resilience or safety and security by discharging harmful substances to its outside. Safety and security studies can be a methodology to solve the problems mentioned above. Murakami proposes that people give up one unique solution when they make a decision. This means it is important they always take it into consideration that all options they choose will be tentative. In other words, they should always try to seek the better solutions to improve the situation. Murakami calls such sustained efforts dynamism of human thought and society. Dynamism is also a necessary condition to reconsider their truism in their daily life which prevents them from recognizing issues caused by science and technology as urgent ones. In this sense, a methodology of safety and security studies will be effective to achieve resilience and sustainability. |
|||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 社会科学ジャーナル 号 84, p. 5-25, 発行日 2017-09-30 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 04542134 |